Thursday, November 20, 2014
How does ignorance about the past cause modern day problems?
Post with the most interesting/compelling/insightful part of your response that you formed in class. Please comment/constructively critique another response as well.
How and why does history get rewritten?
Post with the most interesting/compelling/insightful part of your response that you formed in class. Please comment/constructively critique another response as well.
How important are eyewitness accounts in history?
Post with the most interesting/compelling/insightful part of your response that you formed in class. Please comment/constructively critique another response as well.
Can we say anything with certainty (for sure) in history?
Post with the most interesting/compelling/insightful part of your response that you formed in class. Please comment/constructively critique another response as well.
In what ways is our view of the past built on myths?
Post with the most interesting/compelling/insightful part of your response that you formed in class. Please comment/constructively critique another response as well.
What determines the way in which history is written?
Post with the most interesting/compelling/insightful part of your response that you formed in class. Please comment/constructively critique another response as well.
Do the arts have a responsibility to accurately portray history?
Post with the most interesting/compelling/insightful part of your response that you formed in class. Please comment/constructively critique another response as well.
Monday, November 17, 2014
TOK Presentations
Have one person from your group submit your names, your RLS (with a link if applicable) and your knowledge issue. Also, go through other TOK presentations and feel free to comment on another groups KI. Compliments and positive constructive criticism welcomed.
Thursday, November 13, 2014
David Brooks TED Talk
1. What personal connections can you make that illustrate some of Brooks' main ideas?
2. What connections to the different Areas of Knowledge does Brooks make in his talk?
3. How does he view the relationship between emotion and reason? How is his view different from that of many Enlightenment philosophers? Do you agree or disagree with his view? Explain.
2. What connections to the different Areas of Knowledge does Brooks make in his talk?
3. How does he view the relationship between emotion and reason? How is his view different from that of many Enlightenment philosophers? Do you agree or disagree with his view? Explain.
Friday, November 7, 2014
Freeman Hrabowski TED Talk
1. How is this talk relevant to you?
2. Do you think hard work is more important than
“being smart” when considering the possibility for excellence?
3. Is pursuing a degree in arts and social sciences
better/worse than a STEM degree? Why or
why not?
4. Do you disagree with any of his points?
5. Do you agree with Aristotle’s quote at the end
of the presentation? Is excellence ever
an accident? Is it always choice and not
chance? Why or why not?
6. For those of you considering a degree in math
and science, why are you doing it? Do
you have a passion for the subject? Are
you naturally talented in the subject? Is it a monetary motive? Is one motivation “better” than another? Why or why not?Thursday, November 6, 2014
Cosmos Episode 3
1. Is
collaboration in the Natural Sciences (e.g. Halley and Newton) similar to
collaboration in other AoKs? Is
scientific collaboration unique? How so? (compare it to collaboration in other
AoKs) How do faith and emotion play a
role in scientific collaboration?
2. What role does imagination play in the Natural Sciences? How has the role of religious knowledge systems in shaping scientific knowledge changed over the course of scientific progress? Or has it?
3. Does
Newton’s obsession with what most would consider unscientific endeavors
(alchemy, hidden biblical messages, etc.) effect his historical or scientific
legacy? Why or why not? What do you think led him to be so obsessed
with these notions? Was he being
reasonable? Why or why not?
4. In order for knowledge to classify as Science, must it be predictable (like the reappearance of Halley’s comet)? Why or why not?
5. "Science is the only genuine permanent revolution in human affairs, since it is committed to challenging the findings of its forebears.” TWE do you agree with this quote? Why or why not? Are there other AoKs you could replace science with in this quote? Explain.
2. What role does imagination play in the Natural Sciences? How has the role of religious knowledge systems in shaping scientific knowledge changed over the course of scientific progress? Or has it?
4. In order for knowledge to classify as Science, must it be predictable (like the reappearance of Halley’s comet)? Why or why not?
5. "Science is the only genuine permanent revolution in human affairs, since it is committed to challenging the findings of its forebears.” TWE do you agree with this quote? Why or why not? Are there other AoKs you could replace science with in this quote? Explain.
Tuesday, November 4, 2014
Frans Lanting TED Talk
1. Is it our
ethical responsibility to deal with the dramatic loss in diversity of
life? Why or why not? How might a
scientist approach this question? How
might an artist?
2. What role does art play in creating knowledge in
other areas? Try to cite different WoKs
in your response. Be specific.
3. What was the purpose of the story he told at the
beginning of the talk? How are
narratives used in other AoKs to create knowledge?
4. Do you agree with the implication of the
story? Do alternative ways of viewing
the world and explaining what we observe (i.e. indigenous knowledge systems)
help or hinder our search for knowledge (consider all AoKs)? Why or why not?
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
James Randi TED Talk and pseudo science
Respond to the James Randi TED Talk we watched at the end of class below. Remember keep your comments in a discussion format. Disagreement is necessary, inevitable and encouraged, but keep it civil and impersonal. You're disagreeing with ideas, not people. Boom.
Thursday, October 16, 2014
Ai Wei Wei - Never Sorry
Continue the conversation here!
Here are the questions I posed in class:
Here are the questions I posed in class:
1.
Which piece of art/installation/action/moment was
most impactful to you? Why?
2.
How does this film shed light on the
relationship between art and the human sciences (more specifically political
science)? Explain.
3.
How does emotion and imagination play a role in
political activism? Do they help or
hinder the process of activism? What are
some other WoKs featured/used in this documentary and how are they used?
4.
What are some ethical implications of the
artistic knowledge Ai Wei Wei is trying to produce? Is Ai Wei Wei trying to produce artistic
knowledge or knowledge in some other AoK?
Explain.
5.
Is there another AoK that would be more useful
to Ai Wei Wei (and Chinese citizens with similar motives) to achieve his goals? Why would it be more useful? Why would it not?
6.
How does the role of political authority inhibit
the creation of artistic knowledge?
7.
What is more important, the message he is
sending to the Chinese government, or the way in which he is doing it? Why?
Wednesday, October 8, 2014
Deductive Reasoning game
Give block, name, color, and number of people for some bonus points! (e.g. Z, Fir, Orange, 50)
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
TED Talk battle : Mark Pagel v Patricia Ryan
Here are the questions, you know what to do! (for those that forgot, I need to see one post and one reply to a post from everybody, THIS IS REQUIRED)
1. Is one language inevitable? Is one language common to the whole world a defensible project? Why or why not?
2. Can we afford to have all these languages? Why or why not?
3. Does language divide us or bring us together? Why?
4. Do we use language as a barrier (Pagel) or as a door (Ryan) to understanding?
5. Does language promote cooperation or act as a barrier to it?
1. Is one language inevitable? Is one language common to the whole world a defensible project? Why or why not?
2. Can we afford to have all these languages? Why or why not?
3. Does language divide us or bring us together? Why?
4. Do we use language as a barrier (Pagel) or as a door (Ryan) to understanding?
5. Does language promote cooperation or act as a barrier to it?
Monday, September 8, 2014
Atheists Feel Awe, Too article KIs
Post your knowledge issues in the comments section below so we can go over them first thing next class.
Indians and Pakistanis rewriting shared history article KIs
Post your knowledge issues in the comments section below so we can go over them first thing next class.
Eyewitness to Icier Arctic article KIs
Post your knowledge issues in the comments section below so we can go over them first thing next class.
'How the World Was' book review article KIs
Post your knowledge issues in the comments section below so we can go over them first thing next class.
Immersion in Nature article KIs
Post your knowledge issues in the comments section below so we can go over them first thing next class.
Geckos article KIs
Post your knowledge issues in the comments section below so we can go over them first thing next class.
Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Mental Maps and Knowledge Claims
Read chapter 1 in your TOK book and be sure to bring your book to class, so we can have enough for a class set. Tomorrow we will be discussing the quote "the map is not the territory" and it's meaning to you as a learner. We will be getting a visit from Mr. Liles (A-day only) as well, so come prepared to use the time we do have as efficiently as possible. Next up we will be exploring the nature of knowledge. What exactly do we mean when we say we "know" something?
Also, you can access the site with the survey we are completing for Mr. Liles here.
Also, you can access the site with the survey we are completing for Mr. Liles here.
Friday, August 22, 2014
Myers-Briggs Personality test
Take the Myers-Briggs test here. We will be using the results for a class discussion. Find the detailed explanations of each personality type here. We will be using these explanations as a basis for discussion.
Some questions we will consider are as follows:
Do you agree with the assessment of your personality type?
Were you surprised by the results?
If you disagree with the Myers-Briggs assessment, which personality are you?
Do you think this test is an accurate measurement of personality type?
Is this method of categorization useful to understand people with different personalities?
How might this test be flawed?
Some questions we will consider are as follows:
Do you agree with the assessment of your personality type?
Were you surprised by the results?
If you disagree with the Myers-Briggs assessment, which personality are you?
Do you think this test is an accurate measurement of personality type?
Is this method of categorization useful to understand people with different personalities?
How might this test be flawed?
Thursday, August 14, 2014
Why ToK?
In order to properly answer this question, you must first understand what this class is not.
This class is not a GPA booster. This class is not a study period.
This class is not like any class you have ever taken. Only one thing is
required of you in order to progress in this class. The one
requirement is that you think, think, and then think some more (and
there will be some writing involved). You will not benefit from this
class if you are preoccupied with a grade you may or may not receive.
The grade is not the goal. Improving the way you think is the
goal. This grade does not matter. Only logical, thoughtful and thorough self-reflection matters.
Theory of Knowledge is often called the "glue" of the IB curriculum. Over the next two years, you will be bombarded with vast amounts of knowledge and rigorous course standards. The purpose of ToK is to take all of your preexisting (and newly acquired) knowledge about Mathematics, Art, Natural Sciences, Human Sciences, History, and Ethics, and question it. Question all of it. Question methods. Question theories. Question assumptions. Question conclusions. Question questions? I'll stop now. Moving on.
Self-reflection, critical thinking, and inquiry skills are three components that a successful ToK student develops throughout this course. Everyday we will be discussing questions that do not have a correct answer. There will be disagreements. This is a good thing. In fact, it's a great thing! Without disagreement we can not properly address the knowledge issues at hand. Lastly, I want this class to be enjoyable! Everyday you will have the opportunity to contribute and express your very own ideas to the class. I expect all of you to be provide the bulk of contributions during discussion. My main role in ToK is to facilitate your development and progression as an active learner in order to improve the way you think, not to tell you what to think. See you in class!
Theory of Knowledge is often called the "glue" of the IB curriculum. Over the next two years, you will be bombarded with vast amounts of knowledge and rigorous course standards. The purpose of ToK is to take all of your preexisting (and newly acquired) knowledge about Mathematics, Art, Natural Sciences, Human Sciences, History, and Ethics, and question it. Question all of it. Question methods. Question theories. Question assumptions. Question conclusions. Question questions? I'll stop now. Moving on.
Self-reflection, critical thinking, and inquiry skills are three components that a successful ToK student develops throughout this course. Everyday we will be discussing questions that do not have a correct answer. There will be disagreements. This is a good thing. In fact, it's a great thing! Without disagreement we can not properly address the knowledge issues at hand. Lastly, I want this class to be enjoyable! Everyday you will have the opportunity to contribute and express your very own ideas to the class. I expect all of you to be provide the bulk of contributions during discussion. My main role in ToK is to facilitate your development and progression as an active learner in order to improve the way you think, not to tell you what to think. See you in class!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)